The Shifting Landscape of U.S. Residential Real Estate

A Decline in First-Time Homeownership and a Surge in Rentals
The American housing market is experiencing a notable transformation, characterized by a significant downturn in first-time home purchases and an unprecedented expansion of the rental sector. This shift is largely attributed to a challenging environment marked by elevated borrowing costs and escalating property values, which are increasingly keeping prospective homeowners in rental accommodations.

Recent industry figures indicate a substantial reduction in the number of individuals buying their first homes. Last year, the count of new homebuyers stood at 1.1 million, a decrease of 380,000 from the previous year and nearly half of what has historically been observed. Projections for the current year suggest an even steeper decline, with sales data through May pointing to a total of approximately 40.3 million home sales across the nation. This would represent a further drop from last year’s figures and the lowest sales volume recorded in the U.S. since 1995. This sales slowdown is particularly evident in the market segment for properties priced below $500,000, which traditionally attracts first-time purchasers.

The trend of diminishing new buyers is also reflected in residential construction activity. In May, new home sales saw a 6% decrease compared to the same month in the prior year. Developers often rely on demand for starter homes from first-time buyers, who historically constitute about 40% of new home sales. Consequently, a reduction in new construction suggests a corresponding decrease in the pool of new buyers seeking such properties.

As a direct outcome of these dynamics, the number of households opting for rentals has surged, reaching an all-time high of 46 million across the U.S. The financial barrier to homeownership has become considerably more formidable. Analysis from academic institutions highlights that an individual seeking to purchase a median-priced home today would require an annual income of $127,000 to manage the associated mortgage payments, a sharp increase from $79,000 just a few years prior in 2021. Alarmingly, only a fraction of the current renter population, approximately 6 million out of 46 million, meets this income threshold. This disparity is particularly pronounced among younger generations, with Gen Z and Millennials exhibiting lower homeownership rates at their current life stages compared to Baby Boomers at similar points in their lives.

Unless there are significant adjustments in mortgage interest rates or a substantial depreciation in property values—scenarios that might typically accompany an economic downturn—the aspiration of homeownership is likely to remain out of reach for a considerable segment of the American population for the foreseeable future.

Investment Ponderings from Jack Reutemann

At dinner this past week with a long-time client, I was asked what I thought of Jim Cramer.  I kindly said, “He’s a great speaker, entertainer, and educator, but I’m not sure of his investment advice track record, let me dig up the facts for you.”

An Examination of a Prominent Financial Pundit’s Forecasting Record

A well-known figure in financial media appearing on CNBC’s Mad Money program, Jim Cramer who is often seen as a financial guru, frequently offers his opinions on stock market movements and specific investment opportunities. While his pronouncements often grab headlines and can immediately sway certain stock prices, a deeper look into his long-term prediction accuracy reveals a more nuanced, and often debated, picture.

In the short term, there’s evidence that companies he highlights can experience an initial bump in value, sometimes seeing gains of over a percent in the hours immediately following his televised endorsements. However, this effect tends to be fleeting and does not consistently translate into superior performance over extended periods. When examining the trajectory of his recommended stocks over several months, their collective performance generally aligns with broader market indices, indicating no consistent advantage over simply holding a market-tracking fund.

Analyses of his written investment calls suggest that his success rate hovers slightly below what one might achieve through pure chance, and falls short when compared to other market strategists. A detailed review of hundreds of his “buy” and “sell” suggestions showed that while he might be correct in about three out of five immediate instances, his precision declines significantly after just a month, often leading to negative average returns. Interestingly, his advice to sell stocks sometimes fared better than his “buy” calls, though even then, his correct “sell” predictions were only accurate about 42% of the time over a longer duration.

This commentator has also been associated with several high-profile misjudgments, such as his positive outlook on a bank shortly before its collapse or repeated misinterpretations of a major cryptocurrency exchange’s stock performance. These errors have fueled a popular counter-strategy, where some investors actively bet against his public recommendations, dubbing it the “Inverse” effect. Instances exist where his “sell” advice was followed by considerable gains in those very stocks, further highlighting a lack of consistent foresight.

Within investment circles, his frequent miscalls have become a running jest, inspiring even financial products designed to capitalize on taking the opposite side of his positions. His animated and dramatic presentation style is often perceived as prioritizing entertainment value over consistently sound financial guidance.

In summary, while this high-profile financial personality undeniably wields short-term influence over stock movements, his long-term ability to accurately predict market direction or consistently outperform the market remains unsubstantiated. His forecasting precision tends to be inconsistent, marked by notable misjudgments. Therefore, investors should exercise caution and avoid solely relying on his pronouncements for their long-term investment decisions.

Ultimately, for long-term financial growth, it’s crucial to have a financial advisor who genuinely understands your unique situation and personal goals. Sustainable wealth building stems from a tailored strategy and disciplined approach, not from chasing risky, short-term stock plays based on televised commentary.

Big Change: No More Pennies

No more passing them by when you see one on the sidewalk. Forget about wasting a couple by putting them in your loafers. And don’t even consider throwing them into a wishing well.

The Treasury Department has announced that it is dropping the penny. Officials say the last new pennies will enter circulation in 2026.

Long term—and we’re talking many, many years—don’t expect there to be much difference with your “small change.” After all, there are 114 billion pennies in circulation today. That means roughly 900 for each of the 128 million families in the U.S.

Why the change? Cost, mostly. It costs 3.7 cents to make a penny. Which means the nickel could be next. It costs about 13.8 cents to make those. 

“No More Pennies Could Spark Higher Inflation,” read one of my favorite headlines when the Treasury announced the news.

Some inflation hawks concluded that businesses will start to “round up” prices immediately, putting upward pressure on costs. But that seems like a hasty conclusion. When you dig into the details, you see that nearly 70 percent of in-store payments occur with credit or debit cards. Another big chunk utilizes digital wallets. So, not many retailers are handing back coins to customers.

In fact, I went to a baseball game last week, and the ballpark proudly boasted, “It’s a cashless venue.” Each concession only accepts cards or digital wallets for payment. 

If anyone should be upset about this penny business, it’s Abraham Lincoln. He’s no longer going to be on a coin and a bill. That club now includes only two presidents!  

Sources:

CNBC.com, May 22, 2025. “Get ready to round up: Treasury set to halt penny production”

Finance.Yahoo.com, March 29, 2025. “10 of the Most Valuable Pennies”

USMint.gov, 2025. “Coins – Penny

Capitaloneshopping.com, May 27, 2025. “Cash vs Credit Card Spending Statistics”

MLB.com, 2025. “Information Guides”

This Memorial Day….

Memorial Day is so much more than a long weekend.

It is a chance for us to remember those who gave all for this great nation and the freedoms it offers.

This Memorial Day, we pay tribute to the lives and legacies of those who made the ultimate sacrifice in serving our country, and we honor their courage.

Wishing you and yours a peaceful Memorial Day.

Stock Pullbacks Are Helpful, Not Hurtful

Do me a favor: print the chart in this email and pin it to your wall. I want you to have a constant reminder that stock prices see pullbacks several times during the year.

It’s a normal, healthy part of the investing cycle. Is it unsettling? Very! But when prices turn volatile, I want you to slip into your “Been there, done that” t-shirt.

The second half of February was difficult for investors–and the first part of March was not much better either. There were waves of unsettling news about tariffs, inflation, economic growth, and geopolitical events. 

But was the selling unexpected? Not really. Since 1950, history shows that in post-election years, February has been the worst month for stock prices.

(Spoiler alert: Post-1950, June, August, and September also show poorly in post-election years. So mark your calendar.)

It’s important to remember that past performance does not guarantee future results. Stock prices will fluctuate as market conditions change. So, while we can look to history for trends, it’s uncertain how the rest of 2025 will unfold. 

But if you are getting anxious watching the daily price moves on Wall Street, please call me. I can tell you how I manage the ups and downs.

Carson Investment Research, February 5, 2024

Sunny Side Down: Egg Prices Fall

Forget the Fed frenzy and take a timeout from tariff talk. Let’s focus on what’s really scrambling the markets right now: egg prices.

After reaching an all-time high of $8.17 a dozen in early March, prices have trended lower and may drop below $3 in the coming weeks. What’s behind the sudden fall? The three main reasons are weaker consumer demand, the bird flu coming under control, and ramped-up supply.

So, when will you start to see relief at the checkout line? Soon perhaps. However, grocery store prices remain unpredictable because retailers are still a bit concerned about supply chains.

In recent months, economists have paid more attention to the price of eggs than to other constituents of the Consumer Price Index.

Why have egg prices become a proxy for inflation? 

One theory is that eggs symbolize something bigger about the U.S. economy. Not only are eggs a critical, inexpensive source of protein and nutrients for millions of consumers, but they are also a core part of many other foods made at home or mass-produced. So, eggs have become a tangible symbol of how consumers believe the broader economy is doing.

The Inside Coop: Chicken prices have remained stable despite the bird flu because broilers (chicken raised for meat) tend to have a shorter lifespan than egg-laying hens (6-8 weeks compared to 2 years). Shorter life spans mean flocks are less susceptible to outbreaks, and supply-and-demand issues can be resolved quickly.

I hope today’s email provided some insights into the egg market. It’s not often such a small part of our daily life that takes center stage in economics. 

Sources:
TradingEconomics.com, March 19, 2025. “Eggs US”
TheHill.com, February 13, 2025. “Egg prices are surging, so why are chicken prices stable?”

6Lc_psgUAAAAAA9c7MediJBuq3wAxIyxDSt73c9j